Tuesday, January 29, 2013

What is in Gold-Silver Ratio?

There are interesting digressions going on in silver and gold plays, which reveal a sizzling opportunity as far as investing is concerned. Historically, price of gold and silver has been 16:1, based on the assumption that the availability of silver on earth is 16 times more than gold, or availability of gold is 1/16th times  that of silver. So, theoretically the price of gold to silver should not rise beyond 16:1.
 
The Ground Reality
 
1. Annual mining of gold is 80 million ounce, versus 750 million ounce for silver. Annual recycled amount is 50 million oz. and 250 mill. oz. for gold and silver. So, in total, market availability is 130 million oz. for gold and 1,000 million oz. for silver. This gives us current availability ratio of 8:1 for silver and gold.
 
2. Not all gold and silver are available for investment purposes, due to their various use in industrial applications. For investments (jewellery, bars and coins), the annual availability of gold and silver is roughly 120 million oz. versus 350 million oz. So, real availability ratio of silver and gold is 3:1.
2. In reality, investors are allocating their investments between gold and silver in totally different way. Actual Sales of silver in 2012 was 33,742 million oz., versus 744 million oz. for gold. This gives us a sales ratio of 45:1 for silver to gold.
3. Whereas, availability ratio for silver to gold is 3:1, sales ratio is 45:1 in physical value and 55:1 in dollar value. So, investors choose to buy silver at a ratio that is well above what is available.
 
GOLD
SILVER
RATIO
Annual Mining (mill. oz)
80
750
 
Recycled (mill. oz.)
50
250
 
Total Availability per year (mill. oz.)
130
1,000
8X
Available for Investing (mill. oz.)
120
350
 3X
U.S. Mint Actual Sales in 2012 (mill. oz.), partial data
744
33,742
45X
Investments Value (Billion $)
9,000
150
60X
Market Price (in USD) on Dec.28,2012
$1,656.30
$30.00
55X
 Source: World Gold Council (http://www.gold.org/) , U.S. Geological Survey (http://www.usgs.gov/) and Silver Institute (http://www.silverinstitute.org). Market Prices taken from (http://www.cmi-gold-silver.com/gold-silver-daily-spot-prices/).
How Prices are determined?
The silver price is essentially set in the paper market where the daily average trade on the Comex is approximately 300 million ounces. This is against the daily average mine production of about 2 million ounces!  So, no surprise that the price of silver is such severely manipulated!
The investment market for silver is smaller. While the dollar value of gold in the world approaches $9 trillion, the value of investable silver is estimated at around $150 billion. This is a ratio of 60:1 in dollar terms.
Where is the Market Moving Ahead?
Like we said, historically price ratio of gold and silver is 16:1, Today this ratio is 55:1. So, what are these numbers telling us? In all likelihood this price level cannot be sustainable, silver being such severely underpriced. Those who are smart investors and follow the market, they will be rewarded. Expect a super bull market for silver ahead.

Monday, December 24, 2012

BASEL III: The Game Changer

WHAT IS IN BASEL III?

A silent transformation is about to take place. The price of gold might be permanently affected due to the proposed changes, spearheaded by BIS (Bank of International Settlements), an exclusive group of Central Bank Governors, governed by 58 influential member nations.

Present day banking throughout the world is governed by the guidelines set forth by the BASEL Committee on Banking (of BIS) in the form of BASEL regulations (named after the city of Basel, Switzerland, where this group meets and where the headquarters is). The new BASEL III, proposed to include some radical changes, will change the financial landscape of gold market fundamentally.
ABOUT BASEL
Banks are required to keep provision of capital against their assets, sketched as Risk Weighted Assets. So, the assets have been categorized, according to their risks. The more risky an asset class is, the more provision. First introduced in 1988 to provide a set of minimum capital requirements for banks, known as BASEL I, it was meant to regulate banking industry with a set standard worldwide, as part of New World Economic Order. Since then, BASEL has been considered as global standard for banks  on capital adequacy, stress testing and market liquidity risk.  A more comprehensive set of guidelines,  known as BASEL II, were initiated in 2004. The proposed new changes, coined as BASEL III, are the offshot of financial crisis the world has experienced since 2008.

Tier I capital (core capital) consists, among others,  of treasury securities and mortgage backed securities. Gold used to be considered as tier III capital. Not only that, only 50% of value of gold would be considered, to be included in the capital.
The reality during the last few years have proven to be otherwise. The present monetary system has infected the value of these paper assets of tier I capital from inside, leaving their true value minimal. So banks have realized that whatever has been labelled as  real, is not so. So, they have been compelled to recognize what the true value is.
Accordingly, the status of gold has been "elevated", so much so that it will now be part of tier I capital. Not only that, previously banks were required to keep 4% of tier I capital against their risk-weighted assets. Under proposed rule, the requirement would be 6% of tier I capital.  The result, obviously is a rise in demand for elements  consisting tier I. That means, banks would require not only replace a portion of  their paper assets with bullions, but may use it to meet 2% extra need as well. A very bullish sign indeed.
THE NEW GOLD STANDARD
Starting January 1, 2013 when BASEL III becomes effective, it will usher in a new era for gold market. So, officially from then on, Gold Is Money. Already banks and central banks throughout the world have begun to stockpile their reserve for gold, as a result of its full status as a financial asset. In fact, the World Gold Council revealed that net central bank purchases in 2011 exceeded 455 tonnes, the largest purchase since 1965. And it reported banks will purchase 700 tonnes of gold for this year alone.  

So, in this process of re-monetization of gold, much events are awaiting to be seen in the forthcoming months.
 

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

The Future of Riches

New Economic Reality

The economic trend of the globe is moving towards the East, according to a recent report. By 2050, the global economic centre of gravity is poised to be in Asia, where top 4 countries out of 5 in terms of per capita income will be. The report predicts that within 40 years, Asia will boast more wealthier residents than any other continents.

Fastest Growing economies
Compiled by Citibank and a property consultancy named Knight Frank, it’s a lengthy analysis styled "The Wealth Report 2012," based partly on interviews with the super rich (people with more than $25 million in investable assets). The most interesting part of the study is that, it predicts that Singapore-the tiny Southeast Asian city-state will be the world’s richest nation by 2050, with an estimated per capita income of $137,710.By that they mean its per capita GDP at purchasing power parity (that is, it attempts to more accurately measure the average income by considering inflation, cost of living and exchange rates).
More interestingly, the report predicts that India, Bangladesh, Vietnam, the Philippines, Mongolia and Sri Lanka all make the fast-growing list. Of the top 10 fastest rising economies- all but three are in the region (Table-2).  By contrast, the western European countries as well as Japan will be the worst performing ones.

Shifting Centre of Gravity
LSE professor Danny Quah forecasts that by 2050 the world’s economic centre of gravity- a theoretical measure of the focal point of global economic activity based on GDP, will have shifted eastwards to lie somewhere between China and India. In 1980 it was in the middle of the Atlantic.
Apart from those who inherit wealth, most of the millionaires are business owners. To be able to amass such huge amounts of wealth, means there must be an alignment between opportunity and ability present in these economies. The sectors where most wealth are generated from are- natural resources, manufacturing and construction. Citi forecasts that the North American and Western European share of world real GDP will fall from 41% in 2010 to just 18% in 2050. Developing Asia’s share is expected to rise from 27% to 49% in 2050.
China will overtake the U.S. to become the world’s largest economy by 2020, which in turn will be overtaken by India in 2050. Russia or Brazil (part of so-called BRIC) do not make it on to Citi’s list of Global Growth Generators (“ 3G” countries). Instead Citi includes countries such as Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Iraq, Mongolia, Nigeria, Philippines, Sri Lanka and Vietnam on this list.
While these countries can expect rapid economic growth, much of the wealth already held in developed economies will be maintained, according to Citi.
Measuring a country’s affluence in terms of GDP per capita shows that Singapore currently tops the chart. By 2050, Singapore is expected still to be in the top spot, with Hong Kong and Taiwan moving up to take the second and third places. But the U.S., Canada, UK, Switzerland and Austria will all still be in the top 10, although the U.S. will have dropped down to fifth place in the overall rankings (table-3 ). And the U.S. is the only non-Asian nation to make it through top 5.
Canada, Switzerland and Austria will be able to maintain their berth into the top 10 list upto that time (2050). But old world economies will have the worst growth performance in the next 40 years, the report predicts. Spain, France, Italy and Germany are at the bottom of this list. But, Japan and its aging population will have the weakest projected growth of all economies, Knight Frank estimates.
Most of the countries coined as 3G are currently known as “emerging markets”. But this term is used to tag those countries that are considered likely to thrive in the globally integrated economy.
 
Table 1: THE WORLD’S LARGEST ECONOMIES

2010
Countries
GDP $tn
2050
Countries
GDP $tn
1
US
14.12
1
India
85.97
2
China
9.98
2
China
80.02
3
Japan
4.33
3
US
39.07
4
India
3.92
4
Indonesia
13.93
5
Germany
2.91
5
Brazil
11.58
6
Russia
2.20
6
Nigeria
9.51
7
Brazil
2.16
7
Russia
7.77
8
UK
2.16
8
Mexico
6.57
9
France
2.12
9
Japan
6.48
10
Italy
1.75
10
Egypt
6.02

·         GDP by purchasing power parity (PPP)

·         Source: Global Growth Watchers, Citi Investment Research and Analysis, 2011

Table 2: ECONOMIC GROWTH (3G) 2010-2050

 
TOP 10
%
BOTTOM 10
%
1
Nigeria
8.5
Spain
2.0
2
India
8.0
France
2.0
3
Iraq
7.7
Sweden
1.9
4
Bangladesh
7.5
Belgium
1.9
5
Vietnam
7.5
Switzerland
1.9
6
Philippines
7.3
Austria
1.8
7
Mongolia
6.9
Netherlands
1.7
8
Indonesia
6.8
Italy
1.7
9
Sri Lanka
6.6
Germany
1.6
10
Egypt
6.4
Japan
1.0

·         GDP change year on year

Table 3: GDP PER CAPITA

2010
Countries
$US
2050
Countries
$US
1
Singapore
56,532
1
Singapore
137,710
2
Norway
51,226
2
Hong Kong
116,639
3
US
45,511
3
Taiwan
114,093
4
Hong Kong
45,301
4
South Korea
107,752
5
Switzerland
42,470
5
US
100,802
6
Netherlands
40,736
6
Saudi Arabia
98,311
7
Australia
40,525
7
Canada
96,375
8
Austria
39,073
8
UK
91,130
9
Canada
38,640
9
Switzerland
90,956
10
Sweden
36,438
10
Austria
90,158

·         2010 PPP US $

The report notes that tough economic times over the past few years have not affected the rise of centa-millionaires, people with more than $100 million in assets. Today there are 63,000, up 29 percent since 2006. However, rapidly rising GDP does not tell us much about the distribution of wealth. Many of the richest countries in the world today – Qatar, for example- have tremendous wealth gaps. “The distribution of that wealth will be dictated by political factors as much as the economic process itself,” noted Willem Buiter, Citi’s Chief Economist, in the report.

The Future?
CNN notes that some of the West’s super-rich are already crossing the Pacific, in anticipation of the “new Asian Century”. Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin, moved to Singapore in 2009 and renounced his US citizenship. Jim Rogers, the co-founder of the Quantum Fund with George Soros, did the same and is now teaching his daughters Mandarin. “I’m preparing them for the 21st century by knowing Asia and by speaking perfect Mandarin”, he told CNN. “It’s easier to get rich in Asia than it is in America now. The wind is in your face. (The US) is the largest debtor nation in the history of the world,” Rogers added.
The report warns that the dissatisfaction with income inequality shown in the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations “will gain momentum, and that there could be a long-term recalibration between governments, businesses and society as a result.” No doubt, there could be phenomenal shake-up in global economic and political landscape during these times ahead, with massive scopes of wealth re-distribution. The ones who are well-informed and keen will definitely reap the benefits.